Legal Opinion

People v. Burgos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 16, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that he is entitled to a new trial because he was deprived of the right to be present while potential jurors were questioned at the bench by the court. Because defendant’s trial was held before the Court of Appeals decided People v Antommarchi (80 NY2d 247, rearg denied 81 NY2d 759), defendant had no right, statutory or constitutional, to be present at a bench conference with prospective jurors unless such conference "[concerned] the very same witnesses and events which were to be involved in the case to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. CasperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. People v. MastowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. People v. KnowlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API