Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Hubbell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1912PublishedCited by 11 opinions

FROM FRANKLIN.' Appeal from the Chancery Court of Franklin County. —T. M. McConnell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

This action was brought to recover damages for wrongfully suing out an injunction — not on the bond, hut against the complainants, personally, in the-injunction suit. The chancellor rendered a decree for $1,100, from which a writ of error was prosecuted to this court.

In such an action as the present, where suit is not brought on the bond, it is necessary for the complainant to show malice and want of probable cause, as in actions for malicious prosecution. Pyott Land & Mining Co. v. Tarwater, 126 Tenn., 601, 150 S. W., 539. Defendant herein has made no assignment on this subject, and we need…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allen v. ShanksTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Pyott Land & Mining Co. v. TarwaterTennessee Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. H. P. Rieger & Co. v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  2. Nashville Union Stockyards, Inc. v. GrissimCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
  3. City of Knoxville v. HargisTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Sanitary Appliance Co. v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Memphis Cold Storage Warehouse Co. v. WoodsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API