Legal Opinion

Beadles v. Metayka

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 27, 1957No. 17806, 17807PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

Two writs of error are before us, both arising out of the same judgments in the trial court, and which, pursuant to Rule 112 (g), R.C.P. Colo., are consolidated for consideration upon the same record and transcript. We will refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court or by name. Metayka was plaintiff. One of the defendants, Dr. Beadles, was the surgeon. Another physician, defendant Dr. Norma Bowles, was the anesthetist. The other defendant, The Poor Sisters of St. Francis Seraph Hospital, will be referred to as the hospital.

The action was for damages for personal injuries…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Aderhold v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kitto v. GilbertColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Voss Ex Rel. Voss v. BridwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  3. Carpenter v. Young Ex Rel. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  4. Moon v. Mercy HospitalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  5. Bernardi v. Community Hospital AssociationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API