Legal Opinion

Escribano-Reyes v. Professional HEPA Certificate Corp.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 30, 2016No. 15-1259PPublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

Carlos Escribano-Reyes’s (“Escribano”) discrimination and retaliation suit against his employer, Professional HEPA Certificate Corp. (“HEPA”), ended in summary judgment for HEPA and a sanction order against Escribano’s counsel for filing a “sham affidavit” after he received repeated warnings in earlier cases not to do so.

As to the summary judgment order, Es-cribano first argues that, the district court erred in striking, under the sham affidavit doctrine, a post-discoveiy sworn statement that Escribano had submitted in his opposition to HEPA’s motion for summary judgment.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Borges Ex Rel. SMBW v. Serrano-IsernCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. John Daubert v. NRA Group LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. Xiaoyan Tang v. Citizens Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  3. Pérez v. Oriental Bank & TrustUnited States District Court · 2018
  4. Quintana-Dieppa v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2025
  5. Burnett v. Ocean Properties, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API