Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Grimsley v. Buchanan

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 4, 1983No. 8211SC1003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Summary judgment is proper when “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c); see also Singleton v. Stewart, 280 N.C. 460, 464, 186 S.E. 2d 400, 403 (1972); Carr v. Carbon Corp., 49 N.C. App. 631, 633, 272 S.E. 2d 374, 376 (1980), disc. rev. denied, 302 N.C. 217, 276 S.E. 2d 914 (1981). The party moving for summary judgment has the burden of making a prima…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. King v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Steel Creek Development Corp. v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Carr v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Snow v. North Carolina Board of ArchitectureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Environmental Management Commission v. House of Raeford Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Cobey v. CookCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API