Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Nemier

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1944No. 6634Published

1DissentLarson, Justice

I dissent. I concur with much that is said in the opinion of Mr. Justice WADE, but after skillfully driving the car around several dangerous curves, the driver, in an effort to dodge a chicken in the road, seems to lose control of the car and is thrown into the barrow pit. I concur in holding that where defendants are tried jointly, their peremptory challenges of prospective jurors allowed by Sec. 105-31-15, U. C. A. 1943, must be exercised collectively. The additional challenges allowed by Section 105-31-2, U. C. A. 1943, to each defendant tried jointly, are to enable one such defendant to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. People v. McNabbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Lee Lim v. Davis, WardenUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  5. People v. BurnessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API