Legal Opinion

Gottlieb v. Edelstein

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeonard Leigh Finz, J.

Initially, the decision on these motions must concern itself with the as yet unadjudicated question of what inherent power the court may have to provide a remedy against those who impede justice in a civil case and cause great hardship and expense to opposing parties and their attorneys.

Both defendants move separately for an order granting security for costs to be posted by plaintiff (CPLR 8501, subd [a]). Plaintiff cross-moves for an order striking the answers of the defendants for failure of the defendants to comply with a previous direction of the court.

For the sake of clarity it would be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bennett Bros. v. Floyd Bennett Farmers Market Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  2. Nomako v. AshtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  3. Di Bartolo v. American & Foreign InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Warner v. BumgarnerNew York Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gabrelian v. GabrelianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. McLoughlin v. HenkeNew York Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In re Diane D.New York Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Pournaras v. HopkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API