Legal Opinion

Warner v. Bumgarner

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Macken, J.

Plaintiff moves to punish defendants for contempt pursuant to the Judiciary Law and to impose penalties for failure to comply with disclosure orders pursuant to CPLR 3126,

Plaintiff and defendant Willard Bumgarner were partners in the building and sale of houses. This action for accounting and other relief was commenced June 10, 1964. Defendant Willard Bumgarner counter-claimed for dissolution and accounting. Subsequently, defendants’ attorney withdrew and, although it appears that a stipulation substituting defendants’ present attorney was executed October 22, 1964, an order of substitution…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Di Bartolo v. American & Foreign InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gottlieb v. EdelsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Rogonia v. FergusonNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. In re the Arbitration between Gretka & General Accident GroupNew York Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API