Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lynch v. Fairley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1913No. Nos. 11477, 11478PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Certiorari to review judgments of the superior court for Spokane county, Sullivan, J., entered August 30, 1913, denying writs of mandamus to compel the city council to order recall elections.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

These actions are brought here by relators, seeking a review and reversal of judgments of the superior court for Spokane county, denying mandamus to compel the city council of that city to order a recall election, submitting to the voters the question of the recall of two of its councilmen, under the provisions of its charter. The superior court denied the relief prayed for, upon the ground that the recall provisions of the Spokane charter are superseded by the provisions of the amendment to the state constitution of 1912, being §§ 33 and 34 of art. 1 thereof, and chapter 146, Laws of 1913,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Webster v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Cudihee v. PhelpsWashington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Linde v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Estey v. DempseyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Roberts v. MillikinWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. City of Seattle v. Auto Sheet Metal Workers Local 387Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  5. State Ex Rel. Dore v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API