Legal Opinion

Salley v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 2, 1991No. 23516PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

Petitioner Linda Salley pled guilty to various crimes committed while she was on probation from a previous offense. Her probation was revoked. Petitioner sought post-conviction relief (PCR), alleging, among other things, that she did not knowingly and intelligently waive the right to counsel at her probation revocation hearing. We granted petitioner’s application for writ of certiorari to determine whether the PCR judge erred in finding petitioner validly had waived her right to counsel at the probation revocation hearing. We reverse.

I. FACTS

Petitioner pled guilty to assault…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. High v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Prince v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Wroten v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Barlet v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Columbia v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Stevenson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Duckson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Duckson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API