Exchange Nat. Bank v. Rogers
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HERR, C.
This is a suit instituted in the common pleas court of Tulsa county by M. S. Rogers against the Exchange National Bank of Tulsa to recover damages because of an alleged wrongful compromise of a judgment rendered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, in favor of H. A. Pressey against the city of Tulsa. This judgment was for the sum of $13,196. Plaintiff prevailed at the trial. To reverse the judgment, defendant appeals to this court.
Beth plaintiff and defendant held assignments to the claim out of which grew the judgment. It is conceded that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fant v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1867
- Pritchard v. McLeodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
- White v. American Law Book Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Pope v. Baltimore Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
- Meyer, Strauss, Goodman & Co. v. Farmers & Traders' BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thompson v. General Outdoor Advertising Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944