Legal Opinion

Exchange Nat. Bank v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1928No. 17519PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HERR, C.

This is a suit instituted in the common pleas court of Tulsa county by M. S. Rogers against the Exchange National Bank of Tulsa to recover damages because of an alleged wrongful compromise of a judgment rendered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, in favor of H. A. Pressey against the city of Tulsa. This judgment was for the sum of $13,196. Plaintiff prevailed at the trial. To reverse the judgment, defendant appeals to this court.

Beth plaintiff and defendant held assignments to the claim out of which grew the judgment. It is conceded that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fant v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1867
  2. Pritchard v. McLeodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
  3. White v. American Law Book Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Pope v. Baltimore Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  5. Meyer, Strauss, Goodman & Co. v. Farmers & Traders' BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. General Outdoor Advertising Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API