Legal Opinion

Pope v. Baltimore Warehouse Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 24, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBriscoe, J.

This is a special case stated under the 47th general equity-rule. Code, Art. 16, sec. 184. ■

The facts to enable the Court to decide the questions presented and raised on the record are contained in two statements of facts, submitted to the Circuit Court No. 2¡ of Baltimore City. One was filed on the 7th of May, 1903, and the other (a supplemental statement) was filed on the 14th of February, 1905.

The facts as stated in the record, are these: The William Fait Company, a corporation engaged in the business of canning and packing fruits and vegetables, in the city of Baltimore, purchased of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. General Insurance v. United States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
  2. Hopper v. SmyserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  3. Gardiner v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
  4. Tome v. StumpCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  2. Records v. McKimCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  3. Exchange Nat. Bank v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API