Legal Opinion

LaSalle National Bank v. Harrow Leasing Corp. (In Re Harrow Leasing Corp.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 7, 1983No. 19-10308PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Bankruptcy Judge:

The issue presented in this action for relief from the automatic stay is whether we should grant the debtor’s mid-trial motion for leave to amend its answer to the plaintiff’s complaint by disputing the computation of the interest on its debt, and by joining a third party defendant against whom it will assert a claim for breach of contract.

The facts of the case are as follows: Harrow Leasing Corporation (“Harrow”) filed a petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on July 1, 1983. The debtor’s only asset is an aircraft which was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Essex Properties, Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 1977
  2. Lincoln Bank v. High Sky, Inc. (In Re High Sky, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Citibank, N.A. v. Executive Leasing Corp. (In Re Executive Leasing Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Emerson Quiet Kool Corp. v. Marta Group, Inc. (In Re Marta Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. In Re DennisonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Maryland National Industrial Finance Corp. v. Vacuum Cleaner Corp. of America (In Re Vacuum Cleaner Corp. of America)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. First State Bank of Crossett v. W.E. Tucker Oil Co. (In Re W.E. Tucker Oil Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API