Legal Opinion

State v. Fairchild

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1985No. 13893PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

Roger Kim Fairchild stands convicted of possessing cocaine with intent to deliver. On appeal he raises a host of issues concerning denial of a speedy trial, failure to suppress illegally seized evidence, and prosecutorial misconduct during his trial. For reasons explained below, we deem the speedy trial issue to be dispositive and we reverse the judgment of conviction.

This unusual case presents a convoluted procedural history. Fairchild was arrested on February 27, 1978. For reasons undisclosed by the record, a criminal complaint was not filed until April 14. Fairchild promptly…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. State v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. HobsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. StuartIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. State v. DillardIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. State v. ScroggieIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Harvey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Harvey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API