Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scrivner v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1928No. 4657Published

1Dissent

WM. E. LEE, C. J.,

Dissenting. — I am of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.

It is said in 1 Thompson, Neg., see. 532, that:

“ .... a master who employs a dangerous agency upon his premises, or in the prosecution of his business, and commits such agency to his servants, thereby commits to them his own obligation of using care m respect to them to the end that third persons be not injured by them; and he is responsible for the negligence of his servants in discharging this obligation, although they may have been guilty of the act of negligence, for the sole purpose of accomplishing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Euting v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Riordan v. Gas Consumers' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  3. Pacific Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Bank of Palo AltoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
  4. Vasey v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API