Legal Opinion

Kaeser v. Town of Starksboro

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 2, 1950No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

This is an action of contract in which the plaintiffs seek to recover a balance due on the purchase price of a Marmon Herrington snow plow unit and equipment, for convenience hereafter referred to as a snow plow unit or unit. Trial was by jury. At the close of the evidence both parties moved for a directed verdict. The plaintiffs’ motion was denied and the defendant’s granted. Verdict and judgment accordingly. The case is here on plaintiffs’ exceptions.

It is sufficient to say, without quoting from the record, that both parties in reply to questions by the court stated that there was no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Town of Fair Haven v. StannardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  2. Rosenheim v. HowzeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Duncan Box & Lumber Co. v. SargentWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Brezinski v. TylerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1948

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. A. J. Wolfe Co. v. Baltimore Contractors, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  2. Kaeser v. Town of StarksboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951
  3. ABC Realty Corporation v. BissonetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
  4. Taylor's Guardian v. TaylorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API