Rosenheim v. Howze
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,. and from an order denying a new trial. John M. York, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff sued for a fee alleged to be due to him as an architect for designing and supervising the partial construction of a house on land owned by John Howze. There were two causes of action set forth in the complaint, one based upon an alleged written contract and the other was a declaration upon quantum meruit. Judgment was given for plaintiff in the sum of $2,300.80 and costs. Defendants (as successors of John Howze, deceased) appeal from the judgment and from an order denying the motion for a new trial. .
One of the objections urged to the judgment by the appellants is that no recovery…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nunez v. DautelSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Williston v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- Randall v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1881
- Sears v. WrightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1844
- Greenstreet v. CheatumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
3Cited by11 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Weaver v. GrunbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Banque Russo-Asiatique v. DolchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Bartholomae Oil Corp. v. Oregon Oil & Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Ewell v. LandingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.