Legal Opinion
Zaback v. Kellogg Sales Company
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 29, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00268Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 HARLAN ZABACK, individually and on Case No.: 3:20-cv-00268-BEN-MSB behalf of all others similarly situated, 11 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO Plaintiff, 12 DISMISS v. 13 KELLOGG SALES COMPANY, 14 [ECF No. 16] Defendant. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Kellogg Sales Company’s 17 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Harlan Zaback’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). 18 Kellogg’s motion is granted with leave to amend. 19 I. Background 20 This case concerns Bear Naked Granola V’Nilla Almond (the “Product”).…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kathleen Sonner v. Premier Nutrition Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Zixiang Li v. John F. KerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Stacy v. Rederiet Otto Danielsen, A.S.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.