Roberts v. Bomash
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ROTH J., pro tem.
Defendant and appellant, to the commencement of this action, had filed a petition in bankruptcy and received his discharge. One of the liabilities listed, from which he had been discharged in bankruptcy, was an unconditional contract of guaranty, which forms the basis of the present action. The guaranty in question! was of certain bonds owned and held by plaintiff and respondent, which bonds were secured by a trust deed. The bontjls were in default at the time of appellant’s bankruptcy, affd the holder of the bonds was sent a notice of the bankruptcy advising of her right and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cooke v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Pierce v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Kelley v. GoldschmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Phenix National Bank v. WaterburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- In re HutchcraftDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1917
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. SmythDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952