Legal Opinion

Florey v. Lanning

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 5, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On quo warranto. Demurrer to plea.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gummere, Chief Justice.

The information in this case was filet! for the purpose of having it judicially determined whether the relator or the respondent was entitled to the office of member of common council of the borough of Washington. The material facts are not in dispute. One Isaac J. Shields, a member of the common council, died in February, 1915. Shortly afterward, and on the 2d day of March of that year, the retal or Florey, was appointed by ihe mayor of the borough to succeed the decedent for the uucxpired term, and' Ms appointment was confirmed…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haack v. RanieriNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  2. Burke v. KennyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. Mensone v. NJ Dept. of Civil ServiceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API