Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1986No. 11154PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Justice.

The appellant, Raymond C. Hill, appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for a new trial, amendment of judgment, or relief from judgment in a separate action. We affirm.

Raymond C. Hill [Raymond] and Barbara J. Hill [Barbara] were married on June 8, 1942. On the morning of September 24, 1985, Barbara consulted with her attorney about obtaining a legal separation from Raymond. Later that day, Barbara met with Raymond and discussed a legal separation and a proposed property settlement with him. She also made an appointment for her and Raymond to meet with her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fleck v. FleckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Dvorak v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Wolfe v. WolfeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Lange v. CuseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Moritz v. Medical Arts Clinic, P. C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Soli v. SoliNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Silbernagel v. SilbernagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Binder v. BinderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. EnnenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Hill v. HillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API