Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1986No. 11154Published

1Opinion of the Court

392 N.W.2d 819 (1986)

Barbara HILL, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Raymond C. HILL, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 11154.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

August 20, 1986.

Lundberg, Nodland, Lucas & Schulz, Bismarck, for plaintiff and appellee; argued by Timothy D. Lervick.

Eaton, Van de Streek & Ward, Minot, for defendant and appellant; argued by Michael Ward.

GIERKE, Justice.

The appellant, Raymond C. Hill, appeals from the district court's denial of his motion for a new trial, amendment of judgment, or relief from judgment in a separate action. We affirm.

Raymond C. Hill [Raymond] and Barbara J. Hill…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fleck v. FleckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Dvorak v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Wolfe v. WolfeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Lange v. CuseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Moritz v. Medical Arts Clinic, P. C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API