Legal Opinion

Ruppert v. Singhi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 1, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finch, J.:

The action was brought in June, 1920, upon a demand promissory note for $3,400, dated May 24, 1915. The plaintiff furnished a bill of particulars stating that the consideration for the note was the bonus value of a saloon liquor license. The answer, in addition *632to general denials, set up four separate defenses. The first defense alleges that the note was given in consideration of the transfer to the defendant of a saloon liquor license upon the agreement of the plaintiff that upon the defendant’s procuring a tenant of the saloon premises satisfactory to the plaintiff, plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ochs v. . WoodsNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Juilliard v. . ChaffeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Eastern District Piece Dye Works, Inc. v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Baird v. BairdNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. O'Connor v. WebberNew York Court of Appeals · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Niagara Ferry & Transportation Co. v. Eagle Star & British Dominions InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. Ruppert v. SinghiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. Turk v. HirschAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API