Legal Opinion

Swartzbaugh v. State Farm Insurance

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided May 7, 1997No. 4:95-CV-766 (CEJ)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JACKSON, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motions of the defendant State Farm Insurance Companies (“State Farm”) for summary judgment. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. The plaintiff has filed a memorandum in opposition to the motions.

The plaintiff brings this action pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202, and the Missouri Human Rights Act (“MHRA”), Mo.Rev.Stat. § 213.010 et seq. The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. James F. HUTSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API