Legal Opinion

Robinson v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 9, 1989No. 155, September Term 1986PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAULIFFE, Judge.

The defendant in a criminal trial did not produce a witness whose identity was known only to him, and who, according to the defendant, could give testimony that would tend to exonerate him. The trial judge instructed the jury that they could find that because the defendant failed to produce the witness, the witness’s testimony would have *312been unfavorable to the defendant. The defendant contends the “missing witness” instruction should not have been given because it was more likely than not that the witness, even if called, would not have testified because of a legitimate fear…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Foster v. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. State v. ClawansSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. MacAnaNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Whittlesey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API