Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Hume-Sinclair Coal Mining Company

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 1961No. 23264PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROSS, Judge.

Plaintiff landowners sue defendant coal mining company for damages allegedly resulting from pollution of streams running through their farm lands caused by defendant’s mining operations. Defendant appeals from a jury verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiffs in the amount of $1,600.

The allegations of the petition are, in substance, as follows: Plaintiffs, husband and wife, owned a 299 acre farm in Bates County. Two natural streams flowed through the farm, one bearing the name “Walnut Creek”, the other designated only as the “east branch”. Prior to 1951 those streams afforded a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shelley v. Ozark Pipe Line CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Bollinger v. American Asphalt Roof Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Brown v. City of MarshallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frank v. Environmental Sanitation Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. Zakibe v. Ahrens & McCarron, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Burg v. DampierMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Pettengill v. TuroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
  5. Spain v. City of Cape GirardeauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API