Legal Opinion

Fuksman v. Handler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for dental malpractice, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), dated January 21,1998, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the Statute of Limitations was properly denied since there are questions of fact as to when the last treatment occcurred and the purpose of that treatment (see generally, Kimiatek v…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kimiatek v. PostAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Parker v. JankunasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. LaRose v. CricchioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API