Legal Opinion

Sides v. Scharff Bros.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Bill in Equity by Creditors, to set aside Conveyances as Vol- ■ untary and Fraudulent. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Walker. Heard before the Hon. Thomas Cobbs.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLELLAN, J.

— The bill seeks to subject certain lands, conveyed by W. F. Sides to his wife and children, to the satisfaction of a debt, due from him to the complainants, Scharff Brothers. It is alleged that one S. Glick and said Sides, from March 21st to May 7th, 1887, and before and after, constituted a mercantile firm under the name of S. Glick & Co., and between the dates stated became indebted as partners to the complainants, in sums aggregating $973.30 by account; that on July 27th, 1887, the account was closed by three promissory notes signed by the firm, and by each member individually, due…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Seals v. Robinson & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Caldwell v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. Mobile Savings Bank v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. Moog v. FarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  5. Murphy v. Hunt, Miller & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ginn v. HardySupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  2. Wood & Son v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Beall & Coston v. Lehman Durr Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Moore v. AltomSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Wood v. PottsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API