Government of the Virgin Islands v. Kidd
District Court, Virgin Islands
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam 1
This panel is called upon to determine: 1) whether appellant's removal from the courtroom during the reading of the verdict and the polling of the jury is reversible error; 2) whether the trial judge erred in denying appellant's motion to suppress his statements to police officers after he had been given his Miranda warnings; and 3) whether the trial judge erred in failing to suppress certain pieces of evidence seized from appellant's apartment. For the reasons stated below, we will affirm appellant's conviction and sentence.'
FACTS
On the morning of November 29,1995, the…
Also in this document: Per curiam 2.
3Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Coastal General Construction Services, Inc. v. Virgin Islands Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2002
- Drury v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Drury v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002