Legal Opinion

State v. Singletary

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1985No. 8413SC443PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

The defendants contend first that the trial court committed reversible error by denying defendants’ motions to dismiss the charges prior to the beginning of trial on grounds that G.S. 14-223 is unconstitutional on its face due to vagueness.

G.S. 14-223 states:

If any person shall willfully and unlawfully resist, delay, or obstruct a police officer in discharging or attempting to discharge a duty of his office, he shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500.00), imprisonment for not more than six months, or both.

A statute is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. LeighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bostic v. RodriguezDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2009
  2. Fowler v. ValencourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Burton v. City of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Brooks v. N.C. Department of CorrectionDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API