Legal Opinion

Haakinson & Beaty Co. v. Inland Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1984No. 83-089Published

1Opinion of the Court

344 N.W.2d 454 (1984)

216 Neb. 426

The HAAKINSON & BEATY CO., Appellee,

v.

INLAND INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

No. 83-089.

Supreme Court of Nebraska.

February 10, 1984.

James W. Hewitt, Lincoln, for appellant.

Dennis R. Riekenberg of Cassem, Tierney, Adams, Gotch & Douglas, Omaha, for appellee.

KRIVOSHA, C.J., and BOSLAUGH, WHITE, HASTINGS, CAPORALE, SHANAHAN, and GRANT, JJ.

KRIVOSHA, Chief Justice.

This appeal presents to the court a case of first impression in this jurisdiction and concerns itself with the question of whether a forum selection clause, in an indemnity bond, requiring suit to be brought…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. State Ex Rel. Douglas v. Nebraska Mortgage Finance FundNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Haakinson & Beaty Co. v. Inland InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Atkinson v. ReynoldsNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API