Legal Opinion

Haakinson & Beaty Co. v. Inland Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1984No. 83-089PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKrivosha, C.J.

This appeal presents to the court a case of first impression in this jurisdiction and concerns itself with *427the question of whether a forum selection clause, in an indemnity bond, requiring suit to be brought where the project or any part thereof is situated is valid, and enforceable as against a materialman seeking to collect on the bond. The trial court found the provision of the bond to be contrary to the public policy of the State of Nebraska, and therefore void and unenforceable. Additionally, the trial court determined that the materialman was not bound by the clause. We believe that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. State Ex Rel. Douglas v. Nebraska Mortgage Finance FundNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Atkinson v. ReynoldsNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Forburger Stone Co. v. Lion Bonding & Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Shelter Insurance Companies v. FrohlichNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. McShane Construction Company v. Gotham Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  3. Bauers v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Polk County Recreational Ass'n v. Susquehanna Patriot Commercial Leasing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Bartunek v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API