Legal Opinion
McAnly v. Middleton & Reutlinger, P.S.C.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided December 10, 1999No. 5:99-cv-00139PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HEYBURN, District Judge.
After learning that a law firm had obtained his credit report in September 1994, William H. McAnly sued the firm, a partner, an associate, and a client claiming damages for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681 et seq. (1994) (the “FCRA”), intrusion upon seclusion, civil conspiracy, and breach of contract. Now before the Court is Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings as to each of the four claims. In brief, Defendants argue that the FCRA claim is time-barred, that the intrusion upon seclusion claim is preempted,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Andrus v. Glover Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Richard Rylewicz, Thomas Cummings and Barbara Cummings v. Beaton Services, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Perkins v. Northeastern Log HomesKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Barberan v. NationpointDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Islam v. Option One Mortgage Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Johnson v. Citimortgage, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
- Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.