Legal Opinion
OPHEIM v. VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 25, 2021No. 2:20-cv-02483Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MATTHEW OPHEIM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civ. No. 20-02483 (KM) (ESK) VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT; OPINION VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.; AUDI AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT; and AUDI OF AMERICA, INC., Defendants. KEVIN MCNULTY, U.S.D.J.: Plaintiffs in this putative class action purchased Volkswagen or Audi vehicles with an allegedly defective yet concealed engine part, i.e., a timing chain. Plaintiffs sued Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft (“VW AG”), Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. (“VW America”), Audi Aktiengesellschaft (“Audi AG”), and Audi…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Harold Pinker, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Roche Holdings Ltd. Harold PinkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.