Legal Opinion

State v. Quint

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 27, 1989No. 6663PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStoughton, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction rendered after a jury returned a verdict finding him guilty of four counts in a six count information. We find no error.

The first two counts of the information charged the defendant with sexual assault in the first degree, a violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a). The third, fourth and fifth counts charged the defendant with intentionally aiding another person to commit sexual assault in the first degree, a violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-8 and 53a-70 (a). The sixth count charged the defendant with unlawful restraint in the first…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Charles Eugene Monks, United States of America v. Gary A. HoltCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. State v. CassidyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  4. State v. HancichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. State v. BriggsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HenryConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. State v. MontanezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API