Claim of Rhyner v. Hueber Building Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by Hueber Building Company and another, from an award of the State Workmen’s Compensation Commission, made on the 29th day of March, 1915, for the death of Edward M. Rhyner.
1Opinion of the Court
Howard, J.:
This is an appeal from an award to a mother. The principal contention is that the mother was not dependent. But it has been determined by the Commission, as a fact, that she was dependent, and under section 20 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 67 [Laws of 1914, chap. 41], as since amd. by Laws of 1915, chap. 167), where there is any evidence to support such a finding, the decision of the Commission is “final ” and we are not permitted to review. (Matter of Hendricks v. Seeman Bros., 170 App. Div. 133.) In the record before us there is much evidence on the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Claim of Gardner v. Horseheads Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Claim of Walz v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Claim of Hendricks v. Seeman Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
3Cited by14 opinions
- Flint v. City of EldonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Morgan v. Butte Central Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1920
- Cross v. Hermanson Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- In re PetersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Shepard v. Carnation Milk Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.