Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Ricketts

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 12, 2002No. 26393-9-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quinn-Brintnall, A.C.J.

As part of a child custody dispute, the trial court commissioner ordered the father to undergo a psychosexual evaluation. The evaluation required him to submit to examination by penile plethysmograph. The father objected, claiming the test violated his substantive due process rights. He also argued that the test results do not meet the Frye1 standard for admission of scientific evidence. We granted interlocutory discretionary review and stayed the other proceedings pending resolution of this issue. We hold that in a child custody dispute, barring a conviction for sexual…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. In Re the Marriage of KovacsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Norman R. Harrington v. R. Christopher Almy, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hazen v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. In Re Parentage of JHCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. Ramirez v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. In Re Marriage of RickettsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API