Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Ricketts

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 12, 2002No. 26393-9-IIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

43 P.3d 1258 (2002)

111 Wash.App. 168

In re the MARRIAGE OF John Lindsay RICKETTS, Appellant, and

Allison Kathleen Ricketts, Respondent.

No. 26393-9-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

April 12, 2002.

Christopher Kirk Steuart, Seattle, for Appellant.

Frank Parks Weaver, Olympia, for Respondent.

QUINN-BRINTNALL, A.C.J.

As part of a child custody dispute, the trial court commissioner ordered the father to undergo a psychosexual evaluation. The evaluation required him to submit to examination by penile plethysmograph. The father objected, claiming the test violated his substantive due process…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. In Re the Marriage of KovacsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Norman R. Harrington v. R. Christopher Almy, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hazen v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. In Re Parentage of JHCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. Ramirez v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API