State v. Carlsen
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Chief Justice:
Defendant Terry Carlsen appeals from his conviction of tampering with a witness, a third degree felony. 1 Defendant raises the following three issues on appeal: (1) that the trial court committed prejudicial error by admitting hearsay evidence; (2) that the evidence presented was factually and legally insufficient to sustain defendant’s conviction; and (3) that the statutorily defined offense of tampering with a witness is unconstitutionally vague.
Paul Hardy was the principal witness against defendant in a previous trial in which defendant was accused of disturbing the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. StrohWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. BradshawUtah Supreme Court · 1975
- Branch v. Salt Lake County Service Area No. 2-Cottonwood HeightsUtah Supreme Court · 1969
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. ShicklesUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. CavalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. GarciaUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Wayment v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. DavieCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.