Legal Opinion

State v. Carlsen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1981No. 17208PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

Defendant Terry Carlsen appeals from his conviction of tampering with a witness, a third degree felony. 1 Defendant raises the following three issues on appeal: (1) that the trial court committed prejudicial error by admitting hearsay evidence; (2) that the evidence presented was factually and legally insufficient to sustain defendant’s conviction; and (3) that the statutorily defined offense of tampering with a witness is unconstitutionally vague.

Paul Hardy was the principal witness against defendant in a previous trial in which defendant was accused of disturbing the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. StrohWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. BradshawUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Branch v. Salt Lake County Service Area No. 2-Cottonwood HeightsUtah Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. ShicklesUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. CavalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. State v. GarciaUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Wayment v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. DavieCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API