Legal Opinion

Harper v. Lin

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 29, 2025No. 3:25-cv-08068Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 PATRICK ROY HARPER, 10 Case No. 25-cv-08068-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL 12 RITA F. LIN, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 Pro se Plaintiff Patrick Roy Harper’s ill-defined claims against two federal district court 17 judges are dismissed. A trial court may dismiss a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) sua sponte and 18 without notice “where the claimant cannot possibly win relief.” Omar v. Sea-Land Serv., Inc., 813

19 F.2d 986, 991

(9th Cir. 1987) (citing Wong v. Bell, 642 F.2d 359, 361–62 (9th Cir.1981);

5 C. 20

Wright…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ernest J. Franceschi, Jr., Esq. v. Kenneth Schwartz, Commissioner of South Orange County Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Shui King Tam Wong, Gong Yuen Wong, Wing Sun Wong v. Griffin B. Bell, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Ex parte WardNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  4. Vance v. Chicago Portrait Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API