Legal Opinion

Martha G. Tate, Individually and as of the Estate of Lake E. Tate, Deceased v. Government Employees Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 17, 1993No. 92-6292PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:

Upon the death of Lake E. Tate (Tate), Martha G. Tate (appellant), the decedent’s spouse, sued Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO), the issuer of a group accidental death insurance policy (policy), to recover benefits under the policy for Tate’s accidental death. Appellant appeals the district court’s granting of GEICO’s motion for a directed verdict. 1 Because we find genuine issues of fact and misapplication of state law, we vacate the judgment and remand the case to the district court.

FACTS

On October 19, 1988, Tate entered the Veterans Administration…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. BONITZ, ETC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. Emergency Aid Insurance Co. v. DobbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Union Central Life Insurance Company v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Pensacola Motor Sales Inc. v. Eastern Shore Toyota, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Tierney v. Black Bros. Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
  5. Associated Scrap Metal, Inc. v. Royal Globe InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API