Legal Opinion
Radio-Craft Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 2, 1925No. 3065PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
Edwin H. Armstrong was the patentee and owner of United States letters patent No. 1,113,149, for the use of regenerative circuit, with electron discharge tubes, in radio apparatus. On September 20, 1921, he granted a license under the patent to the Radio-Craft Company, Inc., to manufacture and sell radio apparatus. The controversy before us arose over the meaning of paragraph 3 in the license agreement. It provides that:
“The licensor hereby grants to the licensee a nonexclusive, nontransferable license to manufacture the apparatus and to sell the apparatus of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- De Witt v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Southern Realty Investment Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. SimonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1915
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Cities Service Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Owl Fumigating Corporation v. California Cyanide Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1928
- Reynolds Spring Co. v. L. A. Young Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Trans Pacific Insurance v. Trans-Pacific InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Driscoll, R. v. Arena, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Ethyl Corporation v. Hercules Powder CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.