Legal Opinion
Owl Fumigating Corporation v. California Cyanide Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 2, 1928No. 579PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, District Judge.
This patent infringement suit of Owl Fumigating Corporation against California Cyanide Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and California Cyanide Company (California), Inc., a California corporation, is based upon four patents — reissue No. 15,248, No. 1,304,747, No. 1,446,093, and No. 1,477,125 — having to do with a method of fumigating trees and plants by subjecting the tree or plant to the action of gas produced by the expansion of liquid hydrocyanic acid and with apparatus to make the application. The California company is the operating company. It was not served…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Corsicana Nat. Bank of Corsicana v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Pulllman's Palace Car Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Krivo Industrial Supply Company and Morgan Precision Parts, Inc. v. National Distillers and Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. Linear Films, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Japan Petroleum Co.(Nigeria) Ltd. v. Ashland OilDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978
- Burtch v. Opus, LLC (In re Opus East, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2015
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.