Legal Opinion
LY v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 7, 2021No. 2:19-cv-01239Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LEO LY : : CIVIL ACTION v. : : NO. 19-1239 UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY : INSURANCE COMPANY : MEMORANDUM SURRICK, J. MAY 7, 2021 This case is about an insurance coverage dispute. A fire at the home of Plaintiff Leo Ly caused extensive property damage. Defendant Universal Property and Casualty Insurance Company denied Plaintiff’s claim under his homeowner’s insurance policy, citing to an exclusion for loss caused intentionally by the insured. Defendant believes that Plaintiff started the fire himself to recover…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.