Legal Opinion

United States v. Lengyel

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 10, 1915No. Nos. 13-15PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Separate suits by the United States against Stefan Lengyel, Joshua Morris, and August Glantz.

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, District Judge.

In each of the above cases the United States has invoked the remedy provided in the fifteenth section of the act of June 29, 1906 (34 Stat. pt. 1, p. 596), entitled “An act * * * to provide for a uniform rule for the naturalization of aliens throughout the United States,” and establishing the Bureau of Naturalization. That section makes it the duty of United States district attorneys, upon affidavits showing good cause, to institute proceedings in any court having jurisdiction to naturalize aliens in their respective judicial districts in which the naturalized citizens may…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. HethSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  2. Sohn v. WatersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Yunghauss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  4. In re YunghaussDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1914
  5. Eichhorst v. LindseyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. KuscheDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1944
  2. In re ValhoffDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API