Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Friedman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1953No. 18112PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

The only exception is to a judgment refusing an interlocutory injunction to prevent a former employee from engaging in a business similar to that of the former employer, because of a clause in the contract of employment which in substance forbids the employee, for a period of twelve months and in a well-defined area, from engaging for himself or others in “any kind or character of business identical or similar with any business operated by” the employer. While meeting the requirements as to. reasonable time and area, this contract is fatally defective and void because…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Orkin Ex. Co. Inc., So. Georgia v. DewberrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  2. Hood v. LeggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  3. Robinson v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Uni-Worth Enterprises, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Dixie Bearings, Inc. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. Cross-Abbott Company v. Howard's, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  4. Arnall Insurance Agency, Inc. v. ArnallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Kessler v. Puritan Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API