Legal Opinion
Hirt v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 287
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 3, 2018No. Case No. 17–2279–JAR–GEBPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GWYNNE E. BIRZER, United States Magistrate Judge
This matter is before the Court on three motions filed by Plaintiffs. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 45 ) is GRANTED ; Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel (ECF No. 58 ) is DENIED ; and Plaintiffs' Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Answers and Objections (ECF No. 74 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part .
I. Background1
A. Nature of the Case
The factual background of this case has been thoroughly explored in previous orders and will not be repeated in detail. In essence,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- AM DATA SERVICE, INC., and RICHARD MILLER v. FUNDING CIRCLE USA, INC.District Court, D. Colorado · 2026
- Ad Astra Recovery Services, Inc. v. HeathDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
- Ad Astra Recovery Services, Inc. v. HeathDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
- Ad Astra Recovery Services, Inc. v. HeathDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
- Apartment Income REIT Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Policy No. B0713MEDTE2202301, and Everest National Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2026
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.