Jordan v. Ridgdill
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Presiding Judge.
The applicant contends that he acquired a road easement running along his south property line because defendants induced him to purchase the property by representing that it was bounded by á twenty-foot street. This claim has no merit. Those preliminary negotiations were merged into the subsequent deed, and the rights of the parties upon the conveyance must be determined with reference to the description contained in the deed. See Taylor v. Board of Trustees, 185 Ga. 61 (1) (194 SE 169). The deed, which described the property by courses and distances, made no reference…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tietjen v. MeldrimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Fisher v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Maddox v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Taylor v. Board of Trustees of Glenlock Public SchoolSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Follendore v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.