Pennington v. Felt
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION FREDERICK PENNINGTON, JR PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 4:23-CV-00199-LPR DEXTER PAYNE, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff Frederick Pennington, Jr.’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED.1 He reports no income and no savings.2 Mr. Pennington’s Motion to Amend his Complaint is GRANTED.3 The law requires that I screen the Complaint and Amended Complaint.4 A pro se plaintiff must set forth enough factual allegations to “nudge[] their claims across the line from…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.