Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Hogan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 1997No. 96APE12-1640PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-appellant, Deana L. Putnam, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas which referred attorney Thomas Taneff s claim for fees against plaintiff to binding arbitration before the Ohio State Bar Association pursuant to DR 2-107(B). Because the trial court erred in referring the fee dispute between plaintiff and Taneff to binding arbitration before the Ohio State Bar Association, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand for further proceedings.

The lengthy and tortured history of this action began on May 5, 1993, when plaintiff filed two complaints…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fox v. Eaton Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Reid, Johnson, Downes, Andrachik & Webster v. LansberryOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Cohen v. GoldbergerOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Mancino v. City of LakewoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Foor v. Huntington National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re Estate of SouthardOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Slater v. Ohio Dep't of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Twin Sewer & Water, Inc. v. Midwest Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Schroeder v. DevitoOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Dymarkowski v. Savage (In re Hadley)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API